Abstract
In response to calls regarding the applicability of self-leadership measurement in Eastern (collectivistic) and Western (individualistic) cultures, this study examined the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the modified self-leadership questionnaire (MSLQ). The sample consisted of 395 Chinese students and 241 Australian students. Results revealed that the modified self-leadership questionnaire exhibited a satisfactory condition of psychometric properties across cultures. A series of multi-sample confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated the cross-cultural similarity of an 11-factor model across the Chinese and Australian samples. The modified self-leadership questionnaire was also found to possess measurement invariance, suggesting that it is appropriate for cross-cultural research assessing differences of self-leadership behaviour across Chinese and Western cultures. Implications for future research are also discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-111 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- Collectivistic culture
- Individualistic culture
- Measurement equivalence
- Modified self-leadership questionnaire (MSLQ)
- Psychometric properties
- Self-leadership
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Extending self-leadership research to the East: Measurement equivalence of the Chinese and English versions of the MSLQ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver