How do Chinese public service professional trainees attribute responsibility to victims and perpetrators of violence against women?

Catherine So Kum Tang, Suet Yan Tam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two-hundred-and-twenty-five Chinese human service professional trainees (80 police trainees, 45 medical students, and 100 nursing students) participated in a study on responsibility attribution to violence against women (VAW). Results showed that compared to medical students and police trainees, nursing students had broader definitions of VAW, endorsed more liberal attitudes toward women, and perceived VAW as more prevalent and having more negative effects on the victims and society. Compared to police trainees, medical and nursing students assigned greater responsibility to VAW perpetrators. However, there was no group difference in the attribution of responsibility to VAW victims. Among the predictor variables for a low level of responsibility attribution to the victims, liberal attitude toward women was the only significant predictor. For a low level of responsibility attribution to the perpetrators, the most salient predictors were being police trainees and perceiving VAW as having little negative effects on the victims. Limitations and implications of the study will also be discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-253
Number of pages9
JournalSex Roles
Volume48
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003

Keywords

  • Chinese human service professional trainees
  • Responsibility attribution
  • Violence against women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do Chinese public service professional trainees attribute responsibility to victims and perpetrators of violence against women?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this