Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People typically underestimate the time necessary to complete their tasks. According to the planning fallacy model of optimistic time predictions, this underestimation occurs because people focus on developing a specific plan for the current task and neglect the implications of past failures to meet similar deadlines. We extend the classic planning fallacy model by proposing that a phenomenal quality of mental imagery - the visual perspective that is adopted - may moderate the optimistic prediction bias. Consistent with this proposal, participants in four studies predicted longer completion times, and thus were less prone to bias, when they imagined an upcoming task from the third-person rather than first-person perspective. Third-person imagery reduced people's focus on optimistic plans, increased their focus on potential obstacles, and decreased the impact of task-relevant motives on prediction. The findings suggest that third-person imagery helps individuals generate more realistic predictions by reducing cognitive and motivational processes that typically contribute to bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-149
Number of pages12
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume117
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Debiasing
  • Imagery
  • Optimism
  • Planning fallacy
  • Prediction
  • Visual perspective

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on prediction: Does third-person imagery improve task completion estimates?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this