Abstract
Making decisions about education choices is challenging and difficult for students. Utilising the theory of reasoned action, we specify and estimate a conceptual framework that captures the cognitive process of decision making of students in choosing top-up higher degrees in Hong Kong. Top-up higher or bachelor’s degrees are top-up undergraduate programmes forming a progression route for sub-degree graduates to earn bachelor’s degrees. We argue that attitudes, subjective norms and perceived value influence a student’s top-up higher education choices. Our results show that family members, educators, job availability and security, social image and difficulty of curriculum play critical roles in influencing students’ decision. We also find differences between females and males, between business and non-business students and between Year 1 and Year 2 students in higher education choices. These findings underscore the importance of educational institutions developing effective policies for promoting top-up higher degree programmes by taking cognisance of gender, the field of study and year of study differences and for policy makers to understand the dynamics of higher education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-356 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Studies in Continuing Education |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Sept 2017 |
Keywords
- Attitudes
- Hong Kong
- perceived value
- subjective norms
- theory of reasoned action
- top-up bachelor degree programmes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Student’s local top-up higher education choices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver