When modesty fails: The social impact of group‐effacing attributions following success or failure

Michael H. Bond, Chi‐Kwan ‐K Chiu, Kwok‐Choi ‐C Wan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored how group members perceived a fellow group member who made either group‐serving or group‐effacing attributions following success or failure. Forty male undergraduates from the Chinese University co‐operated in pairs with a confederate on a demanding group task. After learning that their group's performance had exceeded or failed to meet a standard, the subjects heard their confederate‐partner make group‐effacing or group‐serving attributions. As predicted, subjects evaluated the group‐serving partners more highly (p < 0.05). Preference for group‐enhancing members was discussed as a pancultural response arising from the interdependence of group members. Given the process of social categorization, group members rise or fall together and are therefore socialized to support their group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-338
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When modesty fails: The social impact of group‐effacing attributions following success or failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this